Comments on: BIG Mistakes http://votedaniel.wordpress.com Jersey election campaign 2008, Deputy of St. Mary Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:27:00 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Eastern Correspondent http://votedaniel.wordpress.com/manifesto/#comment-55 Eastern Correspondent Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:45:33 +0000 http://votedaniel.wordpress.com/?page_id=12#comment-55 CONGRATULATIONS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,HURRAH CONGRATULATIONS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,HURRAH

]]> By: daniel wimberley http://votedaniel.wordpress.com/manifesto/#comment-13 daniel wimberley Thu, 02 Oct 2008 05:59:17 +0000 http://votedaniel.wordpress.com/?page_id=12#comment-13 "Bottom of the league" - I say. I have now added a link to the Environment page, from the waste audit sentence, to an article which gives and idea of the thinking behind real waste reduction. Now, on the incinerator First, the idea that the existing incinerator may suddenly die on us is a scare tactic. There are 3 chimneys, one (the biggest) more recent than the 2 old ones, which are indeed past it, and this most recent one one has recently been rejigged. The reception bunker has just had serious work done on it. And anyway presumably TTS do have contingency plans??? Second, the "do not delay" mantra is even odder than that, as the proposed alternatives to the mega bonfire-in-a-bunker would actually be quicker to install and get up and running. As Nick Palmer has said: "If TTS were truly worried about breakdowns before a replacement was ready, they would choose technology such as pyrolysis or plasma gasification which could be in place far earlier, would be much smaller, much more flexible, more future proof, half the cost and far better for any sustainable waste/resources strategy" “Bottom of the league” – I say. I have now added a link to the Environment page, from the waste audit sentence, to an article which gives and idea of the thinking behind real waste reduction.

Now, on the incinerator

First, the idea that the existing incinerator may suddenly die on us is a scare tactic. There are 3 chimneys, one (the biggest) more recent than the 2 old ones, which are indeed past it, and this most recent one one has recently been rejigged. The reception bunker has just had serious work done on it. And anyway presumably TTS do have contingency plans???

Second, the “do not delay” mantra is even odder than that, as the proposed alternatives to the mega bonfire-in-a-bunker would actually be quicker to install and get up and running.

As Nick Palmer has said: “If TTS were truly worried about breakdowns before a replacement was ready, they would choose technology such as pyrolysis or plasma gasification which could be in place far earlier, would be much smaller, much more flexible, more future proof, half the cost and far better for any sustainable waste/resources strategy”

]]> By: Tony Bellows http://votedaniel.wordpress.com/manifesto/#comment-12 Tony Bellows Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:44:35 +0000 http://votedaniel.wordpress.com/?page_id=12#comment-12 This site is brilliant, but could you put more on the incinerator, and what you would put in its place, and why. I am getting so many mixed information from the pro- and anti- lobbies that I am seriously suffering from confusion overload! This site is brilliant, but could you put more on the incinerator, and what you would put in its place, and why. I am getting so many mixed information from the pro- and anti- lobbies that I am seriously suffering from confusion overload!

]]>